Question · asked by 1 review

Nalbuphine vs pethidine: Number of patients with the need for rescue analgesia (12 hours postoperatively)

Population
children undergoing surgery
Intervention
Nalbuphine
Comparison
pethidine
Outcome
Number of patients with the need for rescue analgesia (12 hours postoperatively)

Nalbuphine showed no clear difference in number of patients with the need for rescue analgesia (2 hours… compared with pethidine (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Nalbuphine vs pethidine
Number of patients with the need for rescue analgesia (2 hours postoperatively) · children undergoing surgery
Nalbuphine showed no clear difference in number of patients with the need for rescue analgesia (2 hours… compared with pethidine (low certainty).
Nalbuphine for postoperative pain treatment in children (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.07 [0.52, 2.23]1 study · 77 participantsLow
Nalbuphine vs pethidine
Number of patients with the need for rescue analgesia (24 hours postoperatively) · children undergoing surgery
It is very uncertain whether nalbuphine changes number of patients with the need for rescue analgesia (24 hours… compared with pethidine (very low certainty).
Nalbuphine for postoperative pain treatment in children (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.13 [0.52, 2.44]1 study · 50 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Nalbuphine for postoperative pain treatment in children
2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.