Skin care intervention vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention: Time to onset of eczema
Skin care intervention showed no clear difference in time to onset of eczema compared with standard skin care or no skin care intervention (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Skin care intervention vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention Time to onset of eczema · infants age 12 months or younger Skin care intervention showed no clear difference in time to onset of eczema compared with standard skin care or no skin care intervention (moderate certainty). Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | HR 0.86 [0.65, 1.14] | 9 studies · 3349 participants | Moderate |
Skin care intervention vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention Time to onset of eczema · infants age 12 months or younger Skin care intervention showed no clear difference in time to onset of eczema compared with standard skin care or no skin care intervention (moderate certainty). Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD013534.PUB2, superseded | HR 0.86 [0.65, 1.14] | 9 studies · 3349 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.