Fewer vs more courses of chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy: Secondary malignant neoplasms
Fewer showed no clear difference in secondary malignant neoplasms compared with more courses of chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Fewer vs more courses of chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy Secondary malignant neoplasms · Patients with untreated Hodgkin lymphoma (early stages) Fewer showed no clear difference in secondary malignant neoplasms compared with more courses of chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy (moderate certainty). Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second… (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 1.1 [0.74, 1.62] | 3 studies · 2403 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second malignant neoplasms, overall… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.