Question · asked by 1 review

LAMA add‐on vs ICS alone: Exacerbations (OCS)

LAMA add‐on leads to lower exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (OCS) compared with ICS alone (high certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
LAMA add‐on vs ICS alone
Exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (OCS) · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS alone
LAMA add‐on leads to lower exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (OCS) compared with ICS alone (high certainty).
Long‐acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) added to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus the same dose of ICS… (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.65 [0.46, 0.93]4 studies · 2277 participantsHigh

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Long‐acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) added to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus the same dose of ICS alone for adults with asthma
2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.