Question · asked by 1 review
Monthly pulsed high‐dose dexamethasone vs prednisolone: Change in MRC sum score
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Monthly pulsed high‐dose dexamethasone vs oral prednisolone Change in impairment: change in MRC sum score at endpoint4 · people with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy Corticosteroids for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 39 participants | Low |
Monthly pulsed high‐dose dexamethasone vs oral prednisolone Change in MRC sum score · people with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy Corticosteroids for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD002062.PUB3, superseded | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 39 participants | High |
Monthly pulsed high‐dose dexamethasone vs oral prednisolone Change in MRC sum score · patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy Corticosteroids for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD002062.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 39 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corticosteroids for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.