Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with team training vs SFNRT: NRP performance scores
Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT)… showed no clear difference in NRP performance scores compared with SFNRT (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with team training vs SFNRT NRP performance scores · healthcare professionals involved in attending deliveries Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT)… showed no clear difference in NRP performance scores compared with SFNRT (low certainty). Standardised formal resuscitation training programmes for reducing mortality and morbidity in newborn infants (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | MD 1.4 | 1 study · 98 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standardised formal resuscitation training programmes for reducing mortality and morbidity in newborn infants 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.