Cochrane · systematic review · CD009106
Standardised formal resuscitation training programmes for reducing mortality and morbidity in newborn infants
Dempsey, E, Pammi, M, Ryan, AC, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library
NeonatalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
20
current version
GRADE rated
20
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 10 · 50%Low 6 · 30%Moderate 4 · 20%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation programme (SFNRT) compared with no SFNRT
Population: birth attendants
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge acquisition (Immediately after SFNRT) Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation programme (SFNRT) vs no SFNRT | RR 5.96 [3.6, 9.87] | 1 study · 166 participants | Very low |
Skills Acquisition (Immediately after SFNRT) Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation programme (SFNRT) vs no SFNRT | RR 170.93 [10.78, 2710.85] | 1 study · 166 participants | Very low |
Knowledge retention (6 months after SFNRT) Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation programme (SFNRT) vs no SFNRT | RR 3.6 [2.43, 5.35] | 1 study · 166 participants | Very low |
Skills retention (6 months after SFNRT) Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation programme (SFNRT) vs no SFNRT | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 166 participants | Very low |
Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme compared with basic resuscitation training for reduction in neonatal mortality
Population: Neonates delivered stratified by healthcare professionals involved in attending deliveries
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Early neonatal mortality (mortality in the first 7 days of life) Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme vs basic resuscitation training | RR 0.88 [0.78, 1] | 3 studies · 66162 participants | Moderate |
Early neonatal mortality ‐ traditional birth attendants Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme vs basic resuscitation training | RR 0.79 [0.65, 0.95] | 3 studies · 27673 participants | Moderate |
Early neonatal mortality ‐ nurse/midwife Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme vs basic resuscitation training | RR 1.03 [0.81, 1.31] | 2 studies · 20250 participants | Moderate |
Early neonatal mortality ‐ physician Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme vs basic resuscitation training | RR 1.43 [0.98, 2.08] | 2 studies · 5986 participants | Low |
Early neonatal mortality ‐ family/unattended Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme vs basic resuscitation training | RR 0.71 [0.54, 0.94] | 2 studies · 12253 participants | Moderate |
Late neonatal mortality (mortality at > 7 days up to 28 days of life) Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme vs basic resuscitation training | RR 0.47 [0.2, 1.11] | 1 study · 3274 participants | Low |
Neonatal mortality at 28 days Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme vs basic resuscitation training | RR 0.55 [0.33, 0.91] | 1 study · 3355 participants | Low |
Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with team training compared with SFNRT for improving teamwork behaviour
Population: healthcare professionals involved in attending deliveries
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Teamwork behaviour ‐ any teamwork behaviour Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with team training vs SFNRT | MD 2.41 [1.72, 3.11] | 2 studies · 130 participants | Low |
NRP performance scores Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with team training vs SFNRT | MD 1.4 | 1 study · 98 participants | Low |
Resuscitation duration Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with team training vs SFNRT | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 130 participants | Low |
Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with boosters compared with SFNRT for knowledge and skills retention
Population: healthcare professionals involved in attending deliveries
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge retention ‐ hands on booster on NRP test scores Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with boosters vs SFNRT | MD 7 | 1 study · 31 participants | Very low |
Knowledge retention ‐ video booster on NRP test scores Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with boosters vs SFNRT | MD 4 | 1 study · 30 participants | Very low |
Knowledge retention ‐ any booster on NRP scores Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with boosters vs SFNRT | MD 5.5 | 1 study · 44 participants | Very low |
Skills retention ‐ hands on booster on performance scores Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with boosters vs SFNRT | MD 5 | 1 study · 31 participants | Very low |
Skills retention ‐ video booster on performance scores Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with boosters vs SFNRT | MD 6 | 1 study · 30 participants | Very low |
Skills retention ‐ any booster on performance scores Standardised formal neonatal resuscitation training (SFNRT) programme with boosters vs SFNRT | MD 5.48 | 1 study · 44 participants | Very low |