Question · asked by 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs UFH: Major bleeding

Population
patients with venous thromboembolism.
Intervention
Low molecular weight heparin
Comparison
UFH
Outcome
Major bleeding

LMWH probably leads to lower incidence of major haemorrhagic episodes (during initial treatment ‐… compared with UFH (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
LMWH vs UFH
Incidence of major haemorrhagic episodes (during initial treatment ‐ up to 15 days) · people with venous thromboembolism (VTE)
LMWH probably leads to lower incidence of major haemorrhagic episodes (during initial treatment ‐… compared with UFH (moderate certainty).
Fixed dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins versus adjusted dose unfractionated heparin for the… (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.69 [0.5, 0.95]25 studies · 8780 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Fixed dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins versus adjusted dose unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous…
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.