Question · asked by 1 review

PFMT added to electrical stimulation vs electrical stimulation alone (excluding implanted electrodes): Disease‐specific quality of life

Population
women with urinary incontinence
Intervention
PFMT added to electrical stimulation
Comparison
electrical stimulation alone (excluding implanted electrodes)
Outcome
Disease‐specific quality of life

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
PFMT added to electrical stimulation vs electrical stimulation alone (excluding implanted electrodes)
Condition‐specific quality of life assessed by patient questionnaire such as Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ), King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Pelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for… (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found
PFMT added to electrical stimulation vs electrical stimulation alone (excluding implanted electrodes)
Condition‐specific quality of life assessed by patient questionnaire such as Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ), King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) ‐ not reported · patients with urinary incontinence in women
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Pelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for… (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD010551.PUB2, superseded
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Pelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for urinary incontinence in women
2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.