Question · asked by 1 review

Frankel's function regulator-4 (FR-4) with lip-seal training vs no treatment: Mandibular ramus growth

Population
Children and adolescents (over 80% aged 16 years or younger at treatment start) with anterior open bite (lack of vertical overlap or contact of the upper and lower incisors); sucking habits stopped 1 year or more before treatment; excluding class III skeletal relationship, cleft lip or palate, or other craniofacial syndrome
Intervention
Frankel's function regulator-4 (FR-4) with lip-seal training
Comparison
no treatment
Outcome
Mandibular ramus growth

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Frankel's function regulator-4 (FR-4) with lip-seal training vs No treatment
Mandibular ramus growth · Children and adolescents (over 80% aged 16 years or younger at treatment start) with anterior open bite (lack of… · End of treatment (about 2 years)
Orthodontic and orthopaedic treatment for anterior open bite in children (2014) · Cochrane All outcomes
The author reported no difference between groups in mandibular ramus growth (linear measure Ar-Go). No pooled estimate.1 studyGRADE not reported
Frankel's function regulator-4 (FR-4) with lip-seal training vs No treatment
Mandibular ramus growth · Children and adolescents (over 80% aged 16 years or younger at treatment start) with anterior open bite (lack of… · End of treatment (about 2 years)
Orthodontic and orthopaedic treatment for anterior open bite in children (2007) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD005515.PUB2, superseded
The author reported no difference between groups in mandibular ramus growth (linear measure Ar-Go). No pooled estimate.1 studyGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Orthodontic and orthopaedic treatment for anterior open bite in children
2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
2014-02Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.