Question · asked by 1 review
Movement interventions vs control: Activities of daily living
- Population
- spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury
- Intervention
- Movement interventions
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- Activities of daily living
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Movement interventions vs any control Activities of daily living: effects persisting at least 1 month post intervention · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury The review found no eligible studies for this question. Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Movement interventions vs any control Activities of daily living: immediate effects · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury It is very uncertain whether movement interventions changes activities of daily living: immediate effects compared with any control (very low certainty). Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | SMD 0.57 | 3 studies · 75 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain injury 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.