Question · asked by 1 review
Targeted mass media intervention vs no intervention: Changes in dietary composition, 12 months from baseline
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours vs no intervention Changes in dietary composition, 12 months from baseline · adult, ethnic minority group: self‐described Americans of African heritage Targeted mass media interventions promoting healthy behaviours to reduce risk of non‐communicable diseases… (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 154 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Targeted mass media interventions promoting healthy behaviours to reduce risk of non‐communicable diseases in adult, ethnic minorities 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.