Cochrane · systematic review · CD011683
Targeted mass media interventions promoting healthy behaviours to reduce risk of non‐communicable diseases in adult, ethnic minorities
Mosdøl, A, Lidal, IB, Straumann, GH, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
Public HealthAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
26
current version
GRADE rated
18
No studies
8
Included studies
NR
No studies 8 · 30.8%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 12 · 46.2%Low 5 · 19.2%Moderate 1 · 3.8%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Targeted mass media intervention versus general population mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours
Population: mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Any outcome considered an indicator of change Targeted mass media intervention vs general population mass media intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Proportion smoking reduction, 3 months Targeted mass media intervention vs general population mass media intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 255 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quit‐attempts, 3 months Targeted mass media intervention vs general population mass media intervention | OR 1.97 [1.09, 3.55] | 1 study · 255 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Contemplation ladder to quit smoking (1‐10), 3 months Targeted mass media intervention vs general population mass media intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 255 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Adverse effects Targeted mass media intervention vs general population mass media intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Any outcome considered an adverse effect Targeted mass media intervention vs general population mass media intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours versus no intervention
Population: adult, ethnic minority group: self‐described Americans of African heritage
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
BMI (kg/m2), 12 months from baseline Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 154 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Changes in dietary composition, 12 months from baseline Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 154 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Leisure time physical activity, 12 months from baseline Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 154 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Any measure of knowledge and attitude Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Adverse effects Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Any outcome considered an adverse effect Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Calls to smoking quit lines, during campaign Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 641800 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Calls to smoking quit lines, during and after campaign Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 3e+05 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Proportion of calls from target population during campaign Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 641800 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Proportion of calls from target population during and after campaign Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 3e+05 participants | Very low Downgraded: imprecision |
Programme costs Targeted mass media intervention for promoting healthy behaviours vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 641800 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Targeted mass media intervention versus targeted mass media intervention plus personalised content
Population: adult, ethnic minority groups: Latino immigrants, elderly Chinese immigrants, self‐described Americans of African heritage
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
BMI (kg/m2), 12 months from baseline Targeted mass media intervention vs targeted mass media intervention plus personalised content | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 286 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Intake meeting target from dietary guidelines, 3 months from baseline Targeted mass media intervention vs targeted mass media intervention plus personalised content | OR 5.53 [1.96, 15.58] | 1 study · 718 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Changes in dietary composition, 12 months from baseline Targeted mass media intervention vs targeted mass media intervention plus personalised content | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 286 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Weekly physical activity meeting target from guidelines, 3 months from baseline Targeted mass media intervention vs targeted mass media intervention plus personalised content | OR 1.27 [0.89, 1.8] | 1 study · 718 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Leisure time physical activity, 12 months from baseline Targeted mass media intervention vs targeted mass media intervention plus personalised content | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 286 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Knowledge of nutrition and physical activity guidelines Targeted mass media intervention vs targeted mass media intervention plus personalised content | OR 12.6 [6.5, 24.5] | 12 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Adverse effects Targeted mass media intervention vs targeted mass media intervention plus personalised content | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Any outcome considered an adverse effect Targeted mass media intervention vs targeted mass media intervention plus personalised content | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Costs per person in each treatment arm Targeted mass media intervention vs targeted mass media intervention plus personalised content | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 357 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |