Question · asked by 1 review
[Radial] B‐mode ultrasound vs Doppler assistance: Adverse events (pain)
- Population
- adults requiring radial artery catheterisation
- Intervention
- [Radial] B‐mode ultrasound
- Comparison
- Doppler assistance
- Outcome
- Adverse events (pain)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
[Radial] B‐mode ultrasound vs Doppler assistance Adverse events (pain) · adults requiring radial artery catheterisation The review found no eligible studies for this question. Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- [Radial] B‐mode ultrasound vs near‐infrared laser guidance · adults requiring radial artery catheterisation · 1 review
- [Radial] B‐mode ultrasound vs modified B‐mode ultrasound · adults requiring radial artery catheterisation · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.