NIPPV vs no NIPPV: Pulmonary complications (0 to 30 days)
NIPPV showed no clear difference in pulmonary complications compared with no NIPPV (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
NIPPV vs no NIPPV Pulmonary complications · lung cancer patients NIPPV showed no clear difference in pulmonary complications compared with no NIPPV (low certainty). Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for prevention of complications after pulmonary resection in lung… (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.03 [0.72, 1.47] | 4 studies · 238 participants | Low |
NIPPV vs no NIPPV Pulmonary complications · lung cancer patients NIPPV showed no clear difference in pulmonary complications compared with no NIPPV (low certainty). Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for prevention of complications after pulmonary resection in lung… (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD010355.PUB2, superseded | RR 1.03 [0.72, 1.47] | 4 studies · 238 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for prevention of complications after pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.