Question · asked by 1 review

Resorbable (bioresorbable) plates or screws for fixation vs Titanium plates or screws for fixation: Adverse effects (composite: plate exposure, wound infection, sinus tract, wound dehiscence, plate removal)

Population
Adults (>16 years old) undergoing orthognathic surgery
Intervention
Resorbable (bioresorbable) plates or screws for fixation
Comparison
Titanium plates or screws for fixation
Outcome
Adverse effects (composite: plate exposure, wound infection, sinus tract, wound dehiscence, plate removal)

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Resorbable (bioresorbable) plates or screws for fixation vs Titanium plates or screws for fixation
Adverse effects (composite: plate exposure, wound infection, sinus tract, wound dehiscence, plate removal) · Adults (>16 years old) undergoing orthognathic surgery · Up to 24 months postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for orthognathic surgery (2017) · Cochrane All outcomes
SoF row. Adverse effects; 60 participants (1 RCT); Quality of the evidence (GRADE): VERY LOW. Exposure of the plate: both titanium and resorbable groups experienced 2 plate exposures which occurred between the third…1 study · 60 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Resorbable versus titanium plates for orthognathic surgery
2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
2017-01Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.