Gefitinib vs tri‐weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin: Overall survival
Gefitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival compared with paclitaxel + carboplatin (high certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Gefitinib vs paclitaxel + carboplatin Overall survival · EGFR M+ patients with NSCLC Gefitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival compared with paclitaxel + carboplatin (high certainty). First‐line treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non‐squamous… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | HR 0.95 [0.77, 1.18] | 2 studies · 489 participants | High |
Gefitinib vs paclitaxel + carboplatin Overall survival · EGFR M+ patients with NSCLC Gefitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival compared with paclitaxel + carboplatin (high certainty). First‐line treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non‐squamous… (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD010383.PUB2, superseded | HR 0.95 [0.77, 1.18] | 2 studies · 489 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| First‐line treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non‐squamous non‐small cell lung cancer 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.