Question · asked by 1 review

Acupuncture vs sham control: Adverse events

Population
Patients with idiopathic dysgeusia and hypogeusia
Intervention
Acupuncture
Comparison
sham control
Outcome
Adverse events

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Acupuncture vs Sham control (deactivated laser sham acupuncture)
Adverse events · Patients with idiopathic dysgeusia and hypogeusia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Interventions for managing taste disturbances (2017) · Cochrane All outcomes
Results: The acupuncture trial (Brandt 2008) did not give any data on adverse events in either group.0 studiesNo studies found
Acupuncture vs Sham control (deactivated laser sham acupuncture)
Adverse events · Patients with idiopathic dysgeusia and hypogeusia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Interventions for managing taste disturbances (2014) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD010470.PUB2, superseded
Results: The acupuncture trial (Brandt 2008) did not give any data on adverse events in either group.0 studiesNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for managing taste disturbances
2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
2017-07Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.