Question · asked by 1 review

Acupuncture vs sham: Adverse events

Population
participants with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome
Intervention
Acupuncture
Comparison
sham
Outcome
Adverse events

Acupuncture showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with sham procedure (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Acupuncture vs sham procedure
Adverse events · participants with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome
Acupuncture showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with sham procedure (low certainty).
Non‐pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.33 [0.51, 3.46]3 studies · 204 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Non‐pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome
2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.