Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics: Acute kidney injury
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop… showed no clear difference in acute kidney injury (adverse event) (from admission to discharge) compared with bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop diuretics vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics Acute kidney injury (adverse event) (from admission to discharge) · adults (aged greater than 18 years) with acute heart failure Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop… showed no clear difference in acute kidney injury (adverse event) (from admission to discharge) compared with bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics (low certainty). Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics for acute heart failure (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.02 [0.7, 1.49] | 3 studies · 491 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics for acute heart failure 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.