High dose of manipulation vs low dose of manipulation: Chronic neck pain and CGH Intermediate‐term
High dose of manipulation showed no clear difference in chronic neck pain and CGH Intermediate‐term compared with low dose of manipulation (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
High dose of manipulation vs low dose of manipulation Chronic neck pain and CGH Intermediate‐term · patients with chronic neck pain with cervicogenic headache (CGH) High dose of manipulation showed no clear difference in chronic neck pain and CGH Intermediate‐term compared with low dose of manipulation (moderate certainty). Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 50 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.