Question · asked by 1 review

Mechanical debridement plus topical minocycline vs Mechanical debridement plus chlorhexidine gel: Soreness in the gums

Population
Adults with dental implants and peri-implant mucositis at baseline
Intervention
Mechanical debridement plus topical minocycline
Comparison
Mechanical debridement plus chlorhexidine gel
Outcome
Soreness in the gums

Mechanical debridement plus topical minocycline showed no clear difference in soreness in the gums compared with mechanical debridement plus chlorhexidine gel; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Mechanical debridement plus topical minocycline vs Mechanical debridement plus chlorhexidine gel
Soreness in the gums · Adults with dental implants and peri-implant mucositis at baseline · 12 months
Mechanical debridement plus topical minocycline showed no clear difference in soreness in the gums compared with mechanical debridement plus chlorhexidine gel; GRADE not reported.
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 5.00 [0.66, 38.15]1 study · 32 participantsGRADE not reported
Mechanical debridement plus topical minocycline vs Mechanical debridement plus chlorhexidine gel
Soreness in the gums · Adults with dental implants and peri-implant mucositis at baseline · 12 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2008) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003069.PUB3, superseded
At 10 days no statistical differences in soreness of the gums were reported1 study · 32 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental implants
2010 · Cochrane All outcomes
2010-06-02Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.