Question · asked by 1 review
Internet‐based cognitive and behavioural therapy (I‐C/BT) vs I‐non‐C/BT: Depressive symptoms
- Population
- adults aged ≥ 16 years with PTSD
- Intervention
- Internet‐based cognitive and behavioural therapy (I‐C/BT)
- Comparison
- I‐non‐C/BT
- Outcome
- Depressive symptoms
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Internet‐based cognitive and behavioural therapy (I‐C/BT) vs I‐non‐C/BT Severity of depressive symptoms ( · adults aged ≥ 16 years with PTSD Internet‐based cognitive and behavioural therapies for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 84 participants | Very low |
Internet‐based cognitive and behavioural therapy (I‐C/BT) vs I‐non‐C/BT Severity of depressive symptoms ( · adults with PTSD Internet‐based cognitive and behavioural therapies for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD011710.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 84 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internet‐based cognitive and behavioural therapies for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Internet‐based cognitive and behavioural therapy (I‐C/BT) vs WAIT LIST · adults aged ≥ 16 years with PTSD · 1 review
- Internet‐based cognitive and behavioural therapy (I‐C/BT) vs face‐to‐face non‐CBT · adults aged ≥ 16 years with PTSD · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.