Question · asked by 1 review
High salivary S. mutans level vs Lower salivary S. mutans level: Sites with attachment loss greater than 3 mm
- Population
- Humans with salivary S. mutans measured
- Intervention
- High salivary S. mutans level
- Comparison
- Lower salivary S. mutans level
- Outcome
- Sites with attachment loss greater than 3 mm
High salivary S. mutans was not associated with a clear difference in sites with attachment loss greater than 3 mm.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
High salivary S. mutans level vs Lower salivary S. mutans level Sites with attachment loss greater than 3 mm · Humans with salivary S. mutans measured · Overall High salivary S. mutans was not associated with a clear difference in sites with attachment loss greater than 3 mm. Association between periodontitis and dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2024) All outcomes | OR 0.74 [0.35, 1.60] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Association between periodontitis and dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2024 All outcomes | July 5, 2023 | 34 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.