Question · asked by 1 review

Food and nonalcoholic beverage marketing (exposure) vs No, less, or less powerful food marketing: Food choice

Food marketing probably increases children's choice of the marketed food (OR, 1.97; moderate certainty, RCTs).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Food and nonalcoholic beverage marketing (exposure) vs No, less, or less powerful food marketing
Food choice · Children and adolescents aged 0-19 years · Predominantly high-income countries, Randomized trials
Food marketing probably increases children's choice of the marketed food (OR, 1.97; moderate certainty, RCTs).
Association of Food and Nonalcoholic Beverage Marketing With Children and Adolescents' Eating Behaviors and… (2022) All outcomes
OR 1.97 [1.46, 2.66]22 studies · 3838 participantsModerate
Food and nonalcoholic beverage marketing (exposure) vs No, less, or less powerful food marketing
Food choice · Children and adolescents aged 0-19 years · Predominantly high-income countries, Overall (pooled across designs)
Food marketing was associated with increased odds of choosing the marketed food (pooled OR, 1.77; combined evidence).
Association of Food and Nonalcoholic Beverage Marketing With Children and Adolescents' Eating Behaviors and… (2022) All outcomes
OR 1.77 [1.26, 2.50]27 studiesGRADE not reported
Food and nonalcoholic beverage marketing (exposure) vs No, less, or less powerful food marketing
Food choice · Children and adolescents aged 0-19 years · Predominantly high-income countries, Nonrandomized studies
Nonrandomized evidence on food marketing and food choice is very uncertain (OR, 0.56; very low certainty).
Association of Food and Nonalcoholic Beverage Marketing With Children and Adolescents' Eating Behaviors and… (2022) All outcomes
OR 0.56 [0.05, 5.99]5 studies · 416 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Association of Food and Nonalcoholic Beverage Marketing With Children and Adolescents' Eating Behaviors and Health: A Systematic Review…
2022 All outcomes
March 2020 (updated; initial search April 2019)92Not applicable

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.