Question · asked by 1 review

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) vs Children without anemia (non-anemic): Dental caries

Population
Children or adolescents
Intervention
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA)
Comparison
Children without anemia (non-anemic)
Outcome
Dental caries

Children with iron deficiency anemia are over three times more likely to have dental caries than non-anemic children (OR 3.64, 95% CI 2.45 to 5.40; moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) vs Children without anemia (non-anemic)
Dental caries (presence) · Children and adolescents (0-18 years; most included reviews focused on <6 years) · Pediatric populations (community and clinical); various countries (e.g., India, Iran, China, Peru)
Children with iron deficiency anemia are over three times more likely to have dental caries than non-anemic children (OR 3.64, 95% CI 2.45 to 5.40; moderate certainty).
Association Between Iron Deficiency Anemia and Dental Caries in Children: A Systematic Umbrella Meta-Analysis. (2025) All outcomes
OR 3.64 [2.45, 5.40]3 studiesModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Association Between Iron Deficiency Anemia and Dental Caries in Children: A Systematic Umbrella Meta-Analysis.
2025 All outcomes
Before January 202513Not applicable
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.