Question · asked by 1 review

Remineralizing orthodontic adhesives vs Conventional/control orthodontic adhesive (e.g., Transbond XT) or negative control: Enamel remineralization / anti-demineralization extent

Population
Human teeth with early enamel lesions surrounding orthodontic brackets
Intervention
Remineralizing orthodontic adhesives
Comparison
Conventional/control orthodontic adhesive (e.g., Transbond XT) or negative control
Outcome
Enamel remineralization / anti-demineralization extent

No meta-analysis was conducted; most included in vitro studies reported significant remineralization with remineralizing orthodontic adhesives versus controls.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Remineralizing orthodontic adhesives vs Control orthodontic adhesives
Enamel remineralization or anti-demineralization · Human teeth with early enamel lesions surrounding orthodontic brackets · 5 days to 6 months, In vitro cariogenic-challenge models
No meta-analysis was conducted; most included in vitro studies reported significant remineralization with remineralizing orthodontic adhesives versus controls.
Remineralization and anti-demineralization effect of orthodontic adhesives on enamel surrounding orthodontic… (2024) All outcomes
no estimate extracted24 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Remineralization and anti-demineralization effect of orthodontic adhesives on enamel surrounding orthodontic brackets: a systematic review…
2024 All outcomes
2005 to 2024 (search coverage; exact search date not reported)25Low / Low

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.