Primary study · included by 1 review
Inhibition of enamel demineralization and bond-strength properties of bioactive glass containing 4-META/MMA-TBB-based resin adhesive.
Kohda 2015 · Kohda Naohisa, Iijima Masahiro, Kawaguchi Kyotaro, et al. · European journal of oral sciences · 2015
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Enamel remineralization / anti-demineralization extent Orthodontic adhesives containing bioactive glass (BAG) particles/nanoparticles (including Ag-, Zn-, fluoride-, or Ga-doped BAG) vs Conventional/control orthodontic adhesive (e.g., Transbond XT) or negative control · pH cycling 14 days to 6 months (majority 14 days) | Out of 13 studies that evaluated bioactive glass particles/nanoparticles, 9 reported definitive statistically significant remineralization potential compared to control orthodontic adhesives [17, 21-24, 26-28, 31]; one… | 13 studies | Ungraded |
Enamel remineralization or anti-demineralization Remineralizing orthodontic adhesives vs Control orthodontic adhesives · 5 days to 6 months | no estimate extracted | 24 studies | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.