Comparison of plasma transfusions vs no plasma transfusions when the INR is 1.5 prior to central venous catheter insertion: Number of participants with minor procedure‐related bleeding within 7 days of surgery
It is very uncertain whether comparison of plasma transfusions changes minor procedure‐related bleeding compared with no plasma transfusions when the INR is 1.5 prior to central venous… (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Comparison of plasma transfusions vs no plasma transfusions when the INR is 1.5 prior to central venous catheter insertion Minor procedure‐related bleeding · people with abnormal coagulation requiring a central venous catheter It is very uncertain whether comparison of plasma transfusions changes minor procedure‐related bleeding compared with no plasma transfusions when the INR is 1.5 prior to central venous… (very low certainty). Plasma transfusions prior to insertion of central lines for people with abnormal coagulation (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.67 [0.12, 3.7] | 1 study · 58 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma transfusions prior to insertion of central lines for people with abnormal coagulation 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.