Bovine lung lavage surfactant extract vs modified bovine minced lung surfactant extract: Pulmonary hemorrhage
Bovine lung lavage surfactant extract showed no clear difference in pulmonary hemorrhage compared with modified bovine minced lung surfactant extract (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Bovine lung lavage surfactant extract vs modified bovine minced lung surfactant extract Pulmonary hemorrhage · Preterm infants for prevention of RDS Bovine lung lavage surfactant extract showed no clear difference in pulmonary hemorrhage compared with modified bovine minced lung surfactant extract (low certainty). Comparison of animal‐derived surfactants for the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome… (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.44 [0.88, 2.39] | 2 studies · 1123 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison of animal‐derived surfactants for the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.