Question · asked by 1 review

Occlusal adjustment as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy vs Non-surgical periodontal therapy alone (no occlusal adjustment): Patient acceptability of treatment and its side effects

Population
Adults with chronic periodontitis
Intervention
Occlusal adjustment as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy
Comparison
Non-surgical periodontal therapy alone (no occlusal adjustment)
Outcome
Patient acceptability of treatment and its side effects

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Occlusal adjustment as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy vs Non-surgical periodontal therapy alone (no occlusal adjustment)
Patient acceptability of treatment and its side effects · Adults (aged 18 years or older) with a clinical diagnosis of (chronic) periodontitis · Minimum 3 months (planned)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Occlusal interventions for periodontitis in adults (2008) · Cochrane All outcomes
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Occlusal interventions for periodontitis in adults
2008 · Cochrane All outcomes
2008-04Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.