Question · asked by 1 review

6% sodium fluoride with 6% calcium fluoride varnish vs no treatment: Remineralisation of early enamel caries

Population
Children with early enamel caries (permanent dentition)
Intervention
6% sodium fluoride with 6% calcium fluoride varnish
Comparison
no treatment
Outcome
Remineralisation of early enamel caries

One trial found 6% sodium fluoride plus 6% calcium fluoride varnish significantly reversed early enamel caries versus no treatment; ungraded and not meta-analysed.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
6% sodium fluoride with 6% calcium fluoride varnish vs No treatment
Reversal / remineralisation of early enamel caries · Children with early enamel caries (permanent dentition) · Children in clinical dental settings
One trial found 6% sodium fluoride plus 6% calcium fluoride varnish significantly reversed early enamel caries versus no treatment; ungraded and not meta-analysed.
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a… (2016) All outcomes
One study (Xhemnica 2008) reported a significant reversal of early enamel caries using 6% NaF with 6% calcium fluoride compared with no treatment; this study was excluded from the meta-analysis.1 studyGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a systematic review.
2016 All outcomes
Publications from 1948 to 2014 (search date not reported)17Critically Low / Critically Low

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.