Question · asked by 1 review

Planned elective birth (induction or caesarean) vs expectant management: Caesarean section

Population
pregnant women with gestational diabetes, between 38 ‐ 39 gestational weeks, without other maternal or fetal conditions.
Intervention
Planned elective birth (induction or caesarean)
Comparison
expectant management
Outcome
Caesarean section

It is very uncertain whether planned elective birth (induction or caesarean) changes caesarean section compared with expectant management (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Planned elective birth (induction or caesarean) vs expectant management
Caesarean section · pregnant women with gestational diabetes, between 38 ‐ 39 gestational weeks, without other maternal or fetal conditions.
It is very uncertain whether planned elective birth (induction or caesarean) changes caesarean section compared with expectant management (very low certainty).
Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and… (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.06 [0.64, 1.77]1 study · 425 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and their infants
2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.