Pulmonary rehabilitation vs no pulmonary rehabilitation: Change in dyspnoea score
Pulmonary rehabilitation showed no clear difference in change in dyspnoea Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale compared with no pulmonary rehabilitation (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Pulmonary rehabilitation vs no pulmonary rehabilitation Change in dyspnoea Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale · people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Pulmonary rehabilitation showed no clear difference in change in dyspnoea Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale compared with no pulmonary rehabilitation (low certainty). Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD006322.PUB3, superseded | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 90 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.