Tuberculosis outreach screening vs no intervention: Long‐term tuberculosis prevalence
It is very uncertain whether tuberculosis outreach screening changes long‐term tuberculosis prevalence compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Tuberculosis outreach screening vs no intervention Long‐term tuberculosis prevalence · all age groups It is very uncertain whether tuberculosis outreach screening changes long‐term tuberculosis prevalence compared with no intervention (very low certainty). Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.14 [0.65, 2] | 556836 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.