Question · asked by 1 review
Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs bilevel ventilation: Central AHI
- Population
- Not specified
- Intervention
- Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV)
- Comparison
- bilevel ventilation
- Outcome
- Central AHI
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs bilevel ventilation Central AHI ‐ after 6 weeks Number of participants: 30(1 RCT) Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | Low |
Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs bilevel ventilation Central AHI ‐ after 6 weeks Number of participants: 30(1 RCT) Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.