Question · asked by 1 review

Self etching primer (one-step etchant-and-primer technique) vs Conventional etchants (two-step etch and prime method using 37% phosphoric acid): Damage to the teeth (e.g. tooth decay)

Population
Children and adults with fixed orthodontic brackets bonded to incisors, canines and premolars
Intervention
Self etching primer (one-step etchant-and-primer technique)
Comparison
Conventional etchants (two-step etch and prime method using 37% phosphoric acid)
Outcome
Damage to the teeth (e.g. tooth decay)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Self etching primers (one-step etchant and primer system) vs Conventional etchants (two-step etch and prime method using 37% phosphoric acid)
Damage to the teeth · Children and adults with fixed orthodontic brackets bonded to incisors, canines and premolars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Enamel etching for bonding fixed orthodontic braces (2013) · Cochrane All outcomes
Damage to the teeth: No studies assessed this outcome.Not reportedNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Enamel etching for bonding fixed orthodontic braces
2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
2013-03Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.