Question · asked by 1 review

Fluoride varnish vs placebo or no treatment: Proportion of children developing new caries (deciduous)

Population
Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
Intervention
Fluoride varnish
Comparison
placebo or no treatment
Outcome
Proportion of children developing new caries (deciduous)

Fluoride varnish showed no clear difference in proportion of children developing one or more new caries… compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fluoride varnish vs Placebo or no treatment
Proportion of children developing one or more new caries (primary/deciduous dentition, d(e/m)ft) · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less · At least 1 year, Primary/deciduous dentition
Fluoride varnish showed no clear difference in proportion of children developing one or more new caries… compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.
Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2013) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 0.81 [0.62, 1.06]5 studies · 1228 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents
2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
2013-05-13Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.