Question · asked by 1 review

Fluoride varnish vs Fluoride toothpaste alone: Proportion of children developing new caries (deciduous)

Population
Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
Intervention
Fluoride varnish
Comparison
Fluoride toothpaste alone
Outcome
Proportion of children developing new caries (deciduous)

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fluoride varnish vs Fluoride toothpaste
Proportion of children developing new caries (deciduous) · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane All outcomes
Petersson 1985 reported the proportion of children developing one or more new carious deciduous surfaces; exactly the same proportions were reported in both groups (no evidence of a difference).1 studyGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing dental caries in children and…
2004 · Cochrane All outcomes
2001-10Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.