Question · asked by 1 review
Early loading vs Conventional loading: Prosthesis failure
- Population
- Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
- Intervention
- Early loading
- Comparison
- Conventional loading
- Outcome
- Prosthesis failure
It is very uncertain whether early loading changes prosthesis failure compared with conventional loading (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 60%Very low 2 · 40%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Early loading vs Conventional loading Prosthesis failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants · 1 year It is very uncertain whether early loading changes prosthesis failure compared with conventional loading (very low certainty). Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (2013) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 5.00 [0.63, 39.67] | 1 study · 48 participants | Very low |
Early loading vs Conventional loading Prosthesis failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants · 1 year It is very uncertain whether early loading changes prosthesis failure compared with conventional loading (very low certainty). Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (2009) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003878.PUB4, superseded | RR 5.00 [0.63, 39.67] | 1 study · 48 participants | Very low |
Early loading vs Conventional loading Prosthesis failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants · 1 year Early loading showed no clear difference in prosthesis failure compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (2007) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003878.PUB3, superseded | RR 5.00 [0.63, 39.67] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Early loading vs Conventional loading Prosthesis failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form oral implants · 1 year Early loading led to lower prosthesis failure compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (2004) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003878.PUB2, superseded | No pooled estimate (totals not selected); no statistically significant difference (2 trials: Tawse-Smith 2002; Payne 2002). | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Early loading vs Conventional loading Prosthesis failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form oral implants · 1 year Early loading led to lower prosthesis failure compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (2003) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003878, superseded | One trial (Tawse-Smith 2002): no statistically significant differences for prosthesis failures, implant failures and marginal bone loss after one year; totals not selected. | 1 study · 48 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2012-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.