High-frequency sugar consumption (three or more times daily) vs Low sugar intake (fewer than three times daily): Dental caries in permanent teeth
- Population
- Nigerian individuals with permanent dentition (approximately 12 years and older)
- Intervention
- High-frequency sugar consumption (three or more times daily)
- Comparison
- Low sugar intake (fewer than three times daily)
- Outcome
- Dental caries in permanent teeth
In permanent dentition, high-frequency sugar consumption was associated with non-significant 15% higher odds of caries (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.52), with no heterogeneity (I2=0%; ungraded).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
High-frequency sugar consumption (three or more times daily) vs Low sugar intake (fewer than three times daily) Dental caries experience in permanent dentition · Nigerian individuals with permanent dentition (approximately 12 years and older) · Community and school-based observational studies in Nigeria (12 of 14 in Southwest Nigeria), Permanent dentition In permanent dentition, high-frequency sugar consumption was associated with non-significant 15% higher odds of caries (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.52), with no heterogeneity (I2=0%; ungraded). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between sugar intake and dental caries in Nigeria. (2024) All outcomes | OR 1.15 [0.88, 1.52] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between sugar intake and dental caries in Nigeria. 2024 All outcomes | January 2001 to November 2024 (per Methods; Abstract states January 2001 to March 2023) | 15 | Not applicable |
Studies behind the findings
The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.
- Ajayi 2014 · included by 1 of these review
- Folayan 2007 · included by 1 of these review
- Folayan 2022 · included by 1 of these review
- Oyedele 2017 · included by 1 of these review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.