Question · asked by 1 review
Supraomohyoid neck dissection vs Modified radical neck dissection: Disease-free survival
- Population
- Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
- Intervention
- Supraomohyoid neck dissection
- Comparison
- Modified radical neck dissection
- Outcome
- Disease-free survival
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 1 · 50%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Supraomohyoid neck dissection vs Modified radical neck dissection Disease-free survival · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2023) · Cochrane All outcomes | Disease-free survival: not reported (Guo 2014 reported disease-specific survival, not a review outcome). | 0 studies | No studies found |
Supraomohyoid neck dissection vs Modified radical neck dissection Disease-free survival · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2018) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD006205.PUB4, superseded | Disease-free survival: outcome not reported in a usable way (Guo 2014). | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment 2023 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2022-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.