Summary of findings: SLT vs social support and stimulation: Dropout
Summary of findings: SLT may leads to lower number of dropouts for any reason compared with social support and stimulation (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: SLT vs social support and stimulation Number of dropouts for any reason · adults with aphasia following stroke Summary of findings: SLT may leads to lower number of dropouts for any reason compared with social support and stimulation (low certainty). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.51 [0.32, 0.82] | 5 studies · 413 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.