Question · asked by 1 review
Food and nonalcoholic beverage marketing (exposure) vs No, less, or less powerful food marketing: Food intake
- Population
- Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
- Intervention
- Food and nonalcoholic beverage marketing (exposure)
- Comparison
- No, less, or less powerful food marketing
- Outcome
- Food intake
Food marketing was associated with a significant increase in children's food intake (pooled SMD, 0.25; combined RCT and nonrandomized evidence).
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 1 · 33.3%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Food and nonalcoholic beverage marketing (exposure) vs No, less, or less powerful food marketing Food intake · Children and adolescents aged 0-19 years · Immediate/short-term (post-exposure), Predominantly high-income countries, Overall (pooled across designs) Food marketing was associated with a significant increase in children's food intake (pooled SMD, 0.25; combined RCT and nonrandomized evidence). Association of Food and Nonalcoholic Beverage Marketing With Children and Adolescents' Eating Behaviors and… (2022) All outcomes | SMD 0.25 [0.15, 0.35] | 41 studies | GRADE not reported |
Food and nonalcoholic beverage marketing (exposure) vs No, less, or less powerful food marketing Food intake · Children and adolescents aged 0-19 years · Immediate/short-term (post-exposure), Predominantly high-income countries, Nonrandomized studies Nonrandomized evidence suggests food marketing increases intake but is very uncertain (SMD, 0.34; very low certainty). Association of Food and Nonalcoholic Beverage Marketing With Children and Adolescents' Eating Behaviors and… (2022) All outcomes | SMD 0.34 [0.12, 0.57] | 11 studies · 8436 participants | Very low |
Food and nonalcoholic beverage marketing (exposure) vs No, less, or less powerful food marketing Food intake · Children and adolescents aged 0-19 years · Immediate/short-term (post-exposure), Predominantly high-income countries, Randomized trials Food marketing probably increases children's food intake (SMD, 0.20; moderate certainty, RCTs). Association of Food and Nonalcoholic Beverage Marketing With Children and Adolescents' Eating Behaviors and… (2022) All outcomes | SMD 0.20 [0.10, 0.30] | 30 studies · 2908 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Association of Food and Nonalcoholic Beverage Marketing With Children and Adolescents' Eating Behaviors and Health: A Systematic Review… 2022 All outcomes | March 2020 (updated; initial search April 2019) | 92 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.