Question

Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH): Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success)

Population
Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure
Intervention
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Comparison
Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Outcome
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success)

Reviews word the same question differently. Two decision models (TypeSafe's Jev and Liquid AI's d1) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others, and rows count as this question only when both agree on all four. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each row.

Reviews
2
current versions
Answers
5
all review versions
GRADE rated
2
answers with a certainty rating
Included studies linked
9
full-text reviews only
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 3 · 60%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 40%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

How each review answered it

Current versions only
QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Partial pulpotomy
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 2.81 [1.38, 5.74]NRUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Mature teeth
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 2.63 [1.14, 6.03]NRUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 2.41 [1.28, 4.51]7 studies · 377 participantsLow
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Irreversible pulpitis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 3.17 [1.25, 7.99]NRUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Clinical and radiographic success · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth · 1 to 3 years, Success after vital pulp therapy, Unadjusted; all treatment modalities and root maturities
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 2.94 [1.93, 4.49]10 studies · 900 participantsLow

Trials and studies behind the answers

The primary studies that full-text reviews tie to these outcomes. Reviews from the Summary of Findings tier list no included studies here, and trials have not yet been matched to questions on their own, so this list is incomplete.