Primary study · included by 1 review

Brizuela et al. 2017

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2023 · cited as Brizuela et al. 2017 · Table 3; Ref 9; Figures 9-10 (CH vs MTA)

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Clinical and radiographic success Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH) · 1 to 3 years	OR 2.94 [1.93, 4.49]	10 studies · 900 participants	Low
Clinical and radiographic success (composite) Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) · ≥6 months; follow-up range 1-3 years	OR 2.94 [1.93, 4.49]	10 studies · 900 participants	Low

1 including review in total.