Question · asked by 1 review

Long‐term red cell transfusion vs no transfusion: Stroke

Population
individuals with sickle cell disease who are at risk of a primary stroke who have not had previous long‐term red cell transfusions
Intervention
Long‐term red cell transfusion
Comparison
no transfusion
Outcome
Stroke

Long‐term red cell transfusion probably leads to lower clinical stroke compared with no transfusion (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 2 · 100%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Long‐term red cell transfusion vs no transfusion
Clinical stroke · individuals with sickle cell disease who are at risk of a primary stroke who have not had previous long‐term red cell…
Long‐term red cell transfusion probably leads to lower clinical stroke compared with no transfusion (moderate certainty).
Blood transfusion for preventing primary and secondary stroke in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.12 [0.03, 0.49]2 studies · 326 participantsModerate
Long‐term red cell transfusion vs no transfusion
Clinical stroke · individuals with sickle cell disease who are at risk of a primary stroke who have not had previous long‐term red cell…
Long‐term red cell transfusion probably leads to lower clinical stroke compared with no transfusion (moderate certainty).
Blood transfusion for preventing primary and secondary stroke in people with sickle cell disease (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD003146.PUB3, superseded
RR 0.12 [0.03, 0.49]2 studies · 326 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Blood transfusion for preventing primary and secondary stroke in people with sickle cell disease
2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.