Question · asked by 1 review

Long‐term red cell transfusion vs usual care: Stroke

Population
prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normal TCD velocities
Intervention
Long‐term red cell transfusion
Comparison
usual care
Outcome
Stroke

Long‐term RBC transfusion showed no clear difference in clinical stroke compared with standard care (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Long‐term RBC transfusion vs standard care
Clinical stroke · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normal TCD velocities
Long‐term RBC transfusion showed no clear difference in clinical stroke compared with standard care (low certainty).
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.14 [0.02, 1.12]1 study · 196 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease
2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.