Question · asked by 1 review

DHAT-delivered dental care vs Dentist-delivered dental care: Composite restoration deficiency

Population
Alaska dental health aide therapists
Intervention
DHAT-delivered dental care
Comparison
Dentist-delivered dental care
Outcome
Composite restoration deficiency

Composite restoration deficiency was 15% for DHATs versus 12% for dentists, without a GRADE rating.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
DHAT-delivered dental care vs Dentist-delivered dental care
Composite restoration deficiency · Alaska dental health aide therapists · Alaska Native communities
Composite restoration deficiency was 15% for DHATs versus 12% for dentists, without a GRADE rating.
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013) All outcomes
Proportion of deficient composite restorations 15% vs 12%2 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions and a case study on multilevel…
2013 All outcomes
October 5, 201211Critically Low / Critically Low

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.