Primary study · included by 1 review

Clinical technical performance of dental therapists in Alaska

Bader et al. 2011 · Bader James D., Lee Jessica Y., Shugars Daniel A., et al. · The Journal of the American Dental Association · 2011

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Technical performance / deficient restorations (DHATs vs dentists)
Dental care provided by dental health aide therapists (DHATs, mid-level providers) vs Dental care provided by dentists (or no comparison group) · Cross-sectional (DHATs practising ~9 months to several years)
Deficient restorations (%), DHAT vs dentist 12 vs 22 (DHAT vs dentist)2 studiesUngraded
Composite restoration deficiency
DHAT-delivered dental care vs Dentist-delivered dental care
Proportion of deficient composite restorations 15% vs 12%2 studiesUngraded
Technical performance / deficient restorations (DHATs vs dentists)
Dental care provided by dental health aide therapists (DHATs, mid-level providers) vs Dental care provided by dentists (or no comparison group) · Cross-sectional (DHATs practising ~9 months to several years)
Deficient restorations (%), DHAT vs dentist 15 vs 12 (DHAT vs dentist)2 studiesUngraded
Technical performance / deficient restorations (DHATs vs dentists)
Dental care provided by dental health aide therapists (DHATs, mid-level providers) vs Dental care provided by dentists (or no comparison group) · Cross-sectional (DHATs practising ~9 months to several years)
Deficient placements (%), DHAT vs dentist 3 vs 9 (DHAT vs dentist)2 studiesUngraded

1 including review in total.